Single- and Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Gefapixant (MK-7264), a P2X3 Receptor Antagonist, in Healthy Adults.

Gefapixant (MK-7264, RO4926219, AF-219) is a first-in-class P2X3 antagonists being developed to treat refractory or unexplained chronic cough. The initial single- and multiple-dose safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of gefapixant at doses ranging from 7.5 to 1800 mg were assessed in four clinical trials. Following single-dose administration of 10-450 mg, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of gefapixant in plasma and urine demonstrated low inter-subject variability and a dose-proportional exposure. Following administration of multiple doses twice daily, the plasma exposures were dose-proportional at doses ranging from 7.5 to 50 mg and less than dose-proportional at doses ranging from 100 to 1800 mg. The time to mean peak drug concentration ranged from 2 to 3 h post-dose, and steady state was achieved by 7 days after dosing, with an accumulation ratio of approximately 2, comparing data from day 1 to steady state. The mean apparent terminal half-life ranged from 8.2 to 9.6 h. Gefapixant was primarily excreted unmodified in urine. Gefapixant was well tolerated following single-dose administration up to 1800 mg and multiple doses up to 1800 mg twice daily; there were no serious adverse events (AEs) reported. The most common AE reported was dysgeusia. The PK profile supports a twice-daily dosing regimen.

Treatment with the P2X3-Receptor Antagonist Gefapixant for Acute Cough in Induced Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: A Phase 2a, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Available therapies for acute cough, a condition frequently caused by a viral upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), have shown limited evidence of efficacy. Gefapixant, a P2X3-receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in studies of the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough, but its efficacy for treating acute cough has not been previously studied. METHODS: This was a phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pilot study. Healthy volunteers were randomized 1:1 to receive twice-daily gefapixant 45 mg or placebo and inoculated with human rhinovirus 16 to induce URTI and cough. Participants were observed while quarantined for 7 days after the start of treatment. The primary endpoint was awake cough frequency on day 3, which was objectively measured with a cough-recording device. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to day 3 in subjective cough severity measures (cough severity visual analog scale, Cough Severity Diary) and cough-specific quality of life (Leicester Cough Questionnaire-acute). RESULTS: Of the 46 participants who met inclusion criteria [mean (standard deviation, SD) age, 24.6 (6.5) years; females, n = 8], 40 completed the study (gefapixant, n = 21; placebo, n = 19). There was no significant difference in awake cough frequency on day 3 between the gefapixant and placebo groups [least squares means, 2.4 versus 2.7 coughs per hour, respectively; mean difference (95% confidence interval, CI), -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7); P = 0.75]. There were no significant between-group differences for any of the secondary endpoints. Peak cough frequency was low and occurred later in the study than expected (days 4-5). The safety profile was consistent with that of previous studies of gefapixant. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, gefapixant did not reduce the frequency or severity of acute cough secondary to induced URTI. Induced viral URTI produced mild symptoms, including lower cough frequency than observed in previous studies of patients selected for acute cough associated with naturally occurring URTI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03569033; EudraCT, 2017-000472-28; protocol number, MK-7264-013.

The discovery and development of gefapixant.

Gefapixant is the approved generic name for a compound also known as MK-7264, and prior to that AF-219 and RO-4926219. It is the first-in-class clinically developed antagonist for the P2X3 subtype of trimeric ionotropic purinergic receptors, a family of ATP-gated excitatory ion channels, showing nanomolar potency for the human P2X3 homotrimeric channel and essentially no activity at related channels devoid of P2X3 subunits. As the first P2X3 antagonist to have progressed into clinical studies it has now progressed to the point of successful completion of Phase 3 investigations for the treatment of cough, and the NDA application is under review with US FDA for treatment of refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough. The molecule was discovered in the laboratories of Roche Pharmaceuticals in Palo Alto, California, but clinical development then continued with the formation of Afferent Pharmaceuticals for the purpose of identifying the optimal therapeutic indication for this novel mechanism and establishing a clinical plan for development in the optimal patient populations selected. Geoff Burnstock was a close collaborator and advisor to the P2X3 program for close to two decades of discovery and development. Progression of gefapixant through later stage clinical studies has been conducted by the research laboratories of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (MRL; following acquisition of Afferent in 2016), who may commercialize the product once authorization has been granted by regulatory authorities.

Treatment of Persistent Cough in Subjects with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) with Gefapixant, a P2X3 Antagonist, in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic cough is a highly problematic symptom for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); limited therapeutic options are available. We evaluated gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of chronic cough in IPF. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study included subjects with IPF. Sequence A included gefapixant 50 mg BID (period 1; 14 days) followed by placebo (period 2; 14 days); sequence B had the opposite sequence of treatments. This regimen was specified in a protocol amendment that modified the original active treatment regimen of gefapixant 50 mg BID for 10 days and 150 mg BID for 4 days. Patients randomized to the original treatment regimen were excluded from efficacy analyses but included in safety assessments. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in awake cough frequency (coughs/hour) from periods 1 and 2 combined. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 51 subjects were randomized, 44 of whom were randomized to treatment sequences evaluated in the primary efficacy analysis (i.e., 22 subjects in sequence A and 22 subjects in sequence B); seven subjects received the treatment assigned before the protocol amendment and were excluded from efficacy analyses. The change from baseline in awake cough frequency from periods 1 and 2 combined (mixed model for repeated measures analysis) did not demonstrate a significant reduction versus placebo in cough at day 14 (p = 0.90); in a post hoc analysis of log-transformed data p value for reduction versus placebo at day 14 was 0.07. The most common AEs were related to taste (dysgeusia and ageusia). CONCLUSIONS: Gefapixant was generally well tolerated but was not associated with a significant improvement in chronic cough in subjects with IPF as defined by the primary endpoint in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02502097.

Gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Gefapixant is a P2X3 receptor antagonist that has shown promise for the treatment of refractory and unexplained chronic cough. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gefapixant compared with placebo after 12 weeks of treatment for refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough. METHODS: We did a 12-week, phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough aged 18-80 years who were recruited from 44 primarily outpatient pulmonologist or allergist sites in the UK and the USA. Eligible patients had refractory or unexplained chronic cough lasting 1 year or longer, no radiographic chest abnormality, and 40 mm or more on a 100-mm cough severity visual analogue scale at enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or one of three doses (7·5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg) of oral gefapixant twice daily, every day, for 84 days; visits to investigative sites were on days 1, 28, 42, 56, 70, 84, and 85. The randomisation schedule was computer generated using a permuted block algorithm by Advance Research Associates (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Patients and all personnel involved in the conduct and interpretation of the study were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was placebo-adjusted change from baseline in awake cough frequency after 12 weeks, assessed in the full analysis set, which is a subset of the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were monitored and safety was evaluated in all patients receiving one or more doses of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02612610. FINDINGS: Between Dec 21, 2015, and July 26, 2016, 253 patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=63), gefapixant 7·5 mg (n=64), gefapixant 20 mg (n=63), or gefapixant 50 mg (n=63) twice daily. The mean age of patients was 60·2 (SD 9·9) years and 193 (76%) were women. At 12 weeks, patients' geometric mean awake cough frequency was 18·2 coughs per h (geometric SD 3·1) with placebo, and 14·5 coughs per h (3·7) with 7·5 mg, 12·0 coughs per h (4·2) with 20 mg, and 11·3 coughs per h (2·8) with 50 mg gefapixant. Estimated percentage change relative to placebo was -22·0% (-41·8 to 4·6; p=0·097) with 7·5 mg, -22·2% (-42·0 to 4·3; p=0·093) with 20 mg, and -37·0% (95% CI -53·3 to -14·9; p=0·0027) with 50 mg gefapixant. Dysgeusia was the most common adverse event, occurring in three (5%) patients given placebo, six (10%) given 7·5 mg gefapixant, 21 (33%) given 20 mg gefapixant, and 30 (48%) given 50 mg gefapixant. INTERPRETATION: Targeting purinergic receptor P2X3 with gefapixant at a dose of 50 mg twice daily significantly reduced cough frequency in patients with refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough after 12 weeks of treatment compared with placebo. Further development of gefapixant is warranted for the treatment of chronic cough. FUNDING: Afferent Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA).

Gefapixant in two randomised dose-escalation studies in chronic cough.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gefapixant has previously demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of refractory chronic cough at a high daily dose. The current investigations explore efficacy and tolerability of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of chronic cough using a dose-escalation approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-escalation studies recruited participants with refractory chronic cough. Patients were assigned to receive ascending doses of gefapixant (study 1: 50-200 mg, study 2: 7.5-50 mg) or placebo for 16 days, then crossed-over after washout. The primary end-point was awake cough frequency assessed using a 24-h ambulatory cough monitor at baseline and on day 4 of each dose. Patient-reported outcomes included a cough severity visual analogue scale and the cough severity diary. RESULTS: In clinical studies, gefapixant doses ≥30 mg produced maximal improvements in cough frequency compared with placebo (p<0.05); reported cough severity measures improved at similar doses. Taste disturbance exhibited a different relationship with dose, apparently maximal at doses ≥150 mg. CONCLUSIONS: P2X3 antagonism with gefapixant demonstrates anti-tussive efficacy and improved tolerability at lower doses than previously investigated. Studies of longer duration are warranted.

The effect of gefapixant, a P2X3 antagonist, on cough reflex sensitivity: a randomised placebo-controlled study.

We evaluated the effect of gefapixant on cough reflex sensitivity to evoked tussive challenge.In this phase 2, double-blind, two-period study, patients with chronic cough (CC) and healthy volunteers (HV) were randomised to single-dose gefapixant 100 mg or placebo in a crossover fashion. Sequential inhalational challenges with ATP, citric acid, capsaicin and distilled water were performed 1, 3 and 5 h after dosing. Mean concentrations evoking ≥2 coughs (C2) and ≥5 coughs (C5) post dose versus baseline were co-primary endpoints. Objective cough frequency (coughs·h-1) over 24 h and a cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) were assessed in CC patients. Adverse events were monitored.24 CC patients and 12 HV were randomised (mean age 61 and 38 years, respectively). The cough challenge threshold increased for ATP by 4.7-fold (C2, p≤0.001) and 3.7-fold (C5, p=0.007) for gefapixant versus placebo in CC patients; in HV, C2 and C5 increased 2.4-fold (C2, p=0.113; C5, p=0.003). The distilled water C2 and C5 thresholds increased significantly (p<0.001) by a factor of 1.4 and 1.3, respectively, in CC patients. Gefapixant had no effect on capsaicin or citric acid challenge. Median cough frequency was reduced by 42% and the least squares mean cough severity VAS was 18.0 mm lower for gefapixant versus placebo in CC patients. Dysgeusia was the most frequent adverse event (75% of HV and 67% of CC patients).ATP-evoked cough was significantly inhibited by gefapixant 100 mg, demonstrating peripheral target engagement. Cough count and severity were reduced in CC patients. Distilled water may also evoke cough through a purinergic pathway.

A randomized Phase 2 trial of telavancin versus standard therapy in patients with uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: the ASSURE study.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is a common infection associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Telavancin is a bactericidal lipoglycopeptide active against Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 trial in patients with uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia. METHODS: Patients were randomized to either telavancin or standard therapy (vancomycin or anti-staphylococcal penicillin) for 14 days. Continuation criteria were set to avoid complicated S. aureus bacteremia. The primary end point was clinical cure at 84 days. RESULTS: In total, 60 patients were randomized and 58 received ≥1 study medication dose (all-treated), 31 patients fulfilled inclusion/exclusion and continuation criteria (all-treated target [ATT]) (telavancin 15, standard therapy 16), and 17 patients were clinically evaluable (CE) (telavancin 8, standard therapy 9). Mean age (ATT) was 60 years. Intravenous catheters were the most common source of S. aureus bacteremia and ~50% of patients had MRSA. A similar proportion of CE patients were cured in the telavancin (88%) and standard therapy (89%) groups. All patients with MRSA bacteremia were cured and one patient with MSSA bacteremia failed study treatment in each group. Although adverse events (AEs) were more common in the telavancin ATT group (90% vs. 72%), AEs leading to drug discontinuation were similar (7%) in both treatment arms. Potentially clinically significant increases in serum creatinine (≥1.5 mg/dl and at least 50% greater than baseline) were more common in the telavancin group (20% vs. 7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that telavancin may have utility for treatment of uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia; additional studies are warranted. (Telavancin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia (ASSURE); NCT00062647).

The design and rationale for the Acute Medically Ill Venous Thromboembolism Prevention with Extended Duration Betrixaban (APEX) study.

Randomized clinical trials have identified a population of acute medically ill patients who remain at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) beyond the standard duration of therapy and hospital discharge. The aim of the APEX study is to determine whether extended administration of oral betrixaban (35-42 days) is superior to a standard short course of prophylaxis with subcutaneous enoxaparin (10 ± 4 days followed by placebo) in patients with known risk factors for post-discharge VTE. Patients initially are randomized to receive either betrixaban or enoxaparin (and matching placebo) in a double dummy design. Following a standard duration period of enoxaparin treatment (with placebo tablets) or betrixaban (with placebo injections), patients receive only betrixaban (or alternative matching placebo). Patients are considered for enrollment if they are older than 40 years, have a specified medical illness, and restricted mobility. They must also meet the APEX criteria for increased VTE risk (aged ≥75 years, baseline D-Dimer ≥2× upper the limit of "normal", or 2 additional ancillary risk factors for VTE). The primary efficacy end point is the composite of asymptomatic proximal deep venous thrombosis, symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, non-fatal (pulmonary embolus) pulmonary embolism, or VTE-related death through day 35. The primary safety outcome is the occurrence of major bleeding. We hypothesize that extended duration betrixaban VTE prophylaxis will be safe and more effective than standard short duration enoxaparin in preventing VTE in acute medically ill patients with known risk factors for post hospital discharge VTE.

In vitro activity of telavancin and occurrence of vancomycin heteroresistance in isolates from patients enrolled in phase 3 clinical trials of hospital-acquired pneumonia.

In phase 3 studies of the efficacy of telavancin for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, 704 Gram-positive and 627 Gram-negative aerobic bacterial pathogens were obtained at baseline from 1503 patients. The majority of Gram-positive isolates (n = 650 [92%]) were Staphylococcus aureus, of which 410 (63%) were methicillin-resistant (MRSA). Of the MRSA isolates, 9.5% were identified as heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus. All Gram-positive isolates were inhibited by ≤1 µg/mL of telavancin.

Telavancin versus vancomycin for hospital-acquired pneumonia due to gram-positive pathogens.

BACKGROUND: Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide bactericidal against gram-positive pathogens. METHODS: Two methodologically identical, double-blind studies (0015 and 0019) were conducted involving patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) due to gram-positive pathogens, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patients were randomized 1:1 to telavancin (10 mg/kg every 24 h) or vancomycin (1 g every 12 h) for 7-21 days. The primary end point was clinical response at follow-up/test-of-cure visit. RESULTS: A total of 1503 patients were randomized and received study medication (the all-treated population). In the pooled all-treated population, cure rates with telavancin versus vancomycin were 58.9% versus 59.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -5.6% to 4.3%). In the pooled clinically evaluable population (n = 654), cure rates were 82.4% with telavancin and 80.7% with vancomycin (95% CI for the difference, -4.3% to 7.7%). Treatment with telavancin achieved higher cure rates in patients with monomicrobial S. aureus infection and comparable cure rates in patients with MRSA infection; in patients with mixed gram-positive/gram-negative infections, cure rates were higher in the vancomycin group. Incidence and types of adverse events were comparable between the treatment groups. Mortality rates for telavancin-treated versus vancomycin-treated patients were 21.5% versus 16.6% (95% CI for the difference, -0.7% to 10.6%) for study 0015 and 18.5% versus 20.6% (95% CI for the difference, -7.8% to 3.5%) for study 0019. Increases in serum creatinine level were more common in the telavancin group (16% vs 10%). CONCLUSIONS: The primary end point of the studies was met, indicating that telavancin is noninferior to vancomycin on the basis of clinical response in the treatment of HAP due to gram-positive pathogens.

In vitro activity of telavancin against Gram-positive isolates from complicated skin and skin structure infections: results from 2 phase 3 (ATLAS) clinical studies.

During phase 3 clinical studies of telavancin for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections, a total of 1530 aerobic Gram-positive isolates were identified at baseline. The majority of these strains were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1214; 62% methicillin-resistant). All isolates were inhibited by ≤ 1 µg/mL of telavancin.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of telavancin in elderly men and women.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and tolerability, and the effect of sex on the pharmacokinetic disposition, of a single intravenous dose of telavancin 10 mg/kg in elderly (> or = 65 yrs) subjects. DESIGN: Phase I, open-label, single-dose, sex-stratified study. SETTING: Clinical research unit. SUBJECTS: Eight healthy men and eight healthy women (mean +/- SD ages 70.6 +/- 6.1 and 70.8 +/- 5.5 yrs, respectively). INTERVENTION: Each subject received a 60-minute intravenous infusion of telavancin 10 mg/kg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For the pharmacokinetic analysis, blood samples were collected before drug administration and at regular intervals up to 48 hours after the start of the infusion. Telavancin plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters of telavancin were determined by noncompartmental analysis. Standard clinical laboratory tests and electrocardiograms were used to assess safety and tolerability. The telavancin plasma concentration-time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters for both sexes were comparable. Pooled mean +/- SD clearance, half-life, and volume of distribution at the steady state were 12.2 +/- 1.4 ml/hour/kg, 9.3 +/- 1.3 hours, and 156 +/- 12 ml/kg, respectively. The pooled mean +/- SD plasma concentration of telavancin 24 hours postdose was 10.8 +/- 1.6 microg/ml, exceeding the telavancin minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of organisms for key gram-positive pathogens (0.5 microg/ml). Ten (63%) of the 16 subjects reported at least one adverse event, most of which were mild; no serious adverse events were noted in this study. No clinically significant changes in vital signs, physical examinations, electrocardiograms, or clinical biochemistry profiles were observed. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic parameters of telavancin were similar between elderly men and women and comparable to historical results in healthy young subjects. No evidence was found to support telavancin dosage adjustment based on age or sex.

Mass balance and pharmacokinetics of [14C]telavancin following intravenous administration to healthy male volunteers.

The mass balance and pharmacokinetics of telavancin, a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent, were characterized in an open-label, phase 1 study of six healthy male subjects. After a single 1-h intravenous infusion of 10 mg/kg [14C]telavancin (0.68 microCi/kg), blood, urine, and feces were collected at regular intervals up to 216 h postdose. Whole blood, plasma, urine, and fecal samples were assayed for total radioactivity using scintillation counting; plasma and urine were also assayed for parent drug and metabolites using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The concentration-time profiles for telavancin and total radioactivity in plasma were comparable from 0 to 24 h after the study drug administration. Telavancin accounted for >95% and 83% of total radioactivity in plasma at 12 h and 24 h, respectively. By 216 h, approximately 76% of the total administered dose was recovered in urine while only 1% was collected in feces. Unchanged telavancin accounted for most (83%) of the eliminated dose. Telavancin metabolite THRX-651540 along with two other hydroxylated metabolites (designated M1 and M2) accounted for the remaining radioactivity recovered from urine. The mean concentrations of total radioactivity in whole blood were lower than the concentration observed in plasma, and mean concentrations of THRX-651540 in plasma were minimal relative to mean plasma telavancin concentrations. These observations demonstrate that most of an administered telavancin dose is eliminated unchanged via the kidneys. Intravenous telavancin at 10 mg/kg was well tolerated by all subjects.

Effect of Telavancin on the pharmacokinetics of the cytochrome P450 3A probe substrate midazolam: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in healthy subjects.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of telavancin, a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with potent gram-positive activity, on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A probe substrate. Design. Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Setting. Clinical research center. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen healthy adult volunteers. Intervention. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of telavancin 10 mg/kg or placebo once/day for 7 days. On day 7, a single dose of intravenous midazolam 1 mg was given immediately after completion of the last infusion of telavancin or placebo. Patients crossed over to the alternate treatment regimen after a washout period of at least 7 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on study days 7 and 21. Blood was collected before telavancin or placebo dosing and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours after midazolam administration. Formal equivalence analysis using the two one-sided t test method showed that the geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for midazolam coadministered with telavancin versus midazolam coadministered with placebo were close to unity. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) around the ratios fell within the 0.8-1.25 bioequivalence bounds (geometric mean ratio for AUC from time zero to the last measured plasma concentration 0.95, 90% CI 0.910-0.984; C(max) geometric mean ratio 1.03, 90% CI 0.956-1.11). The multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profile of telavancin with concomitant administration of midazolam (C(max) 97 microg/ml, concentration 24 hrs after completion of telavancin infusion 9 microg/ml, terminal-phase elimination half-life 8.9 hrs, clearance 13.3 ml/hr/kg) was consistent with data from earlier studies. CONCLUSION: These pharmacokinetic data show that intravenous telavancin administered at the intended therapeutic dose does not affect the pharmacokinetics of intravenous midazolam. The results indicate that telavancin is unlikely to inhibit hepatic CYP3A activity to a clinically meaningful extent.

Lack of effect of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of telavancin.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, telavancin, in patients with moderate hepatic impairment compared with healthy controls. DESIGN: Phase I, open-label, single-dose, matched-control, pilot study. SETTING: Clinical research unit. PARTICIPANTS: Eight adults with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B) and eight age-, sex-, and weight-matched healthy control subjects. INTERVENTION: All participants received a single 1-hour intravenous infusion of telavancin 10 mg/kg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis before the infusion and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours after the start of the infusion. Concentrations of telavancin and the most prevalent of several minor hydroxylated metabolites, THRX-651540, were assayed with a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique. Telavancin binding to plasma proteins was determined in a preinfusion sample by using equilibrium dialysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters for telavancin and THRX-651540 were generally similar between the hepatic impairment and control groups. The mean maximum plasma concentration was 21% lower in patients with hepatic impairment than in controls, which was a statistically (analysis of variance, p<0.05), but not clinically, significant difference. There were no other statistically significant between-group differences. Adverse events were few and mild. CONCLUSION: No apparent differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic disposition of telavancin in patients with hepatic impairment compared with healthy controls in this pilot study. Thus, adjustment of the standard telavancin dosage regimen does not appear to be required in patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment.

Lack of pharmacokinetic drug interactions following concomitant administration of telavancin with aztreonam or piperacillin/tazobactam in healthy participants.

This randomized crossover study in healthy participants assessed pharmacokinetic interactions between telavancin, aztreonam, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Part 1: 11 participants received telavancin 10 mg/kg, aztreonam 2 g, or a combination of telavancin 10 mg/kg+aztreonam 2 g intravenously on 3 separate days. Part 2: 12 participants received telavancin 10 mg/kg, piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g, or a combination of telavancin 10 mg/kg+piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g intravenously on 3 separate days. Blood and urine drug concentrations were measured up to 48 hours posttreatment. Drug interactions were assessed by equivalence analysis of noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters, focusing on area under plasma concentration-time curves (AUC), log transformed; if the antilog of the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the mean log AUC difference was within equivalence bounds (0.70, 1.43), the effect of coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of the respective drug was deemed not clinically significant. Plasma concentration-time curves for all treatment pairs were nearly superimposable with comparable values for pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. In equivalence analyses, 90% CI for the mean difference in log AUC in each comparison fell within the predefined clinical equivalence limits and bioequivalence limits (0.80, 1.25). Administration of aztreonam or piperacillin/tazobactam with telavancin had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetic disposition of any of these drugs.

Telavancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections associated with surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: We compared telavancin with vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSI) caused by Gram-positive bacteria. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of clinical and microbiologic efficacy assessed at test-of-cure (7 to 14 days after completing therapy) in 194 patients from 2 randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing telavancin (10 mg/kg intravenous [IV] every 24 hours; n = 101) with vancomycin (1 g IV every 12 hours; n = 93) for the treatment of cSSSI. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar for both treatment groups. Clinical cure and microbiologic eradication rates demonstrated consistent trends favoring telavancin over vancomycin; however, the differences were not statistically significant. The incidence of adverse events was mostly similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of telavancin was at least equivalent to that of vancomycin for the treatment of cSSSI. These data suggest that telavancin may be a useful alternative for treatment of cSSSI caused by S. aureus, particularly MRSA.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of intravenous telavancin in healthy male and female subjects.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of telavancin, an investigational bactericidal lipoglycopeptide, after intravenous (iv) administration to healthy male and female subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, gender-stratified, two-dose study, 79 adult subjects received three daily 60 min iv infusions of telavancin at 7.5 mg/kg (n = 40) or 15 mg/kg (n = 39). Blood and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses at admission, on day 3 pre-infusion and up to 48 h after the start of the day 3 infusion for 73 subjects (45 males and 28 females). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Following the day 3 telavancin dose (7.5 or 15 mg/kg), dose-proportional increases in mean peak plasma concentrations (C(max), 88 versus 186 mg/L for low and high doses, respectively) and total systemic exposures (AUC(0-24), 599 versus 1282 mg.h/L for low and high doses, respectively) were observed. Trough concentrations at steady state were 6 mg/L at 7.5 mg/kg/day and 16 mg/L at 15 mg/kg/day. The elimination half-life was dose-independent; the mean +/- SD ranged from 6.0 +/- 0.6 to 7.5 +/- 1.3 h for low and high doses, respectively. Approximately two-thirds of the total telavancin dose was excreted unchanged in urine over 48 h. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in males and females. CONCLUSIONS: Telavancin displayed linear plasma pharmacokinetics over the dose range 7.5-15 mg/kg/day and was primarily cleared via urinary excretion. No gender-related differences in the pharmacokinetic disposition of telavancin were observed. These data further characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of telavancin, a once-daily therapy targeted for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections.